Martin Luther King, Jr. was real; Obama is a fraud

civil disobedience

“Whenever the early Christians entered a town, the people in power became disturbed and immediately sought to convict the Christians for being “disturbers of the peace” and “outside agitators.” But the Christians pressed on, in the conviction that they were “a colony of heaven,” called to obey God rather than man.” – Martin Luther King, Jr.

Forty-five years ago, a humble servant of God sat in a detainment facility in Birmingham, Alabama, and wrote a letter to his fellow clergymen, whom he felt had left him too desirous of support in his fight for freedom. In his “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”, King displayed wisdom that extends far beyond the reaches of the media’s anointed black leaders of America today. King’s words make Barack Obama sound as thoughtful as George Wallace.

Barack Obama is the self-proclaimed historical apex of liberty and justice in America. In addition to being incorrect, this assertion reveals his own narrow mind and prejudiced heart. Obama is currently the most prominent member of a group of elite blacks who have climbed atop the shoulders of a once-pure movement for liberty and justice, tracking mud and flinging dung along their path, and corrupting the exterior of the civil rights movement, whose core struggle for individual freedom under God will always remain pure. Dishonest, selfish opportunists, like the Obamas, the Clintons, the Sharptons, and the Jacksons, have given a bad name to a great cause.

King was, like myself, a faithful individualist. He believed in the sciences, natural rights, natural law, and the rule of God. This philosophy is what gave him the wisdom, compassion and courage to follow an unpopular and dangerous path. Obama is almost exactly the opposite of King. Like so many politicians before him, Obama believes he is a better ruler than God. He idolizes himself, and nearly all of his followers join in his regrettable rejection of truth. He follows a path beaten to a point of no adversity, and lined with easy cash for liars, sycophants and opportunists.

I could easily attack John McCain on the same charge, because he too would rather rule than lead, but McCain has not so boldly demanded comparison of himself to anyone I particularly admire. He has shown great honesty in allowing himself to be compared to the current President of the United States. There is sadly little difference between the two selfish front-runners for the presidency. When Barack Obama, however, allows himself to be cast in the same light as Martin Luther King, Jr., he commits an awful error that cannot be ignored. King himself, if he were to know Barack Obama, would liken the Senator more to Pilate than to the Messiah, as some in the media have called him.

King believed in God, and the rights of the individual. Obama believes in democracy, and the conscience of a mob, which bears similarity to one that would have lynched King, given the opportunity.

King believed in challenging people. Obama believes in bending to challenges.

King saw one race. Obama sees many.

King wanted Americans to rule themselves. Obama wants to rule Americans.

King’s color was, to himself, merely the external shell of his human being. Obama believes his color is his being. Given their environments, it seems these attitudes would be reversed, but principle is not determined by time or place, and everywhere that King was overflowing with it, Obama will lack it unconscionably.

King saw things as they were. Obama sees things in whatever light he wishes to view them.

King believed in God. Obama believes he is God.

King fought the chains of government. Obama tightens and secures them.

King was a prophet. Obama is a profiteer.

King was suspicious of men who sought power. Obama seeks power.

In short, King was a truly principled man, and Obama is a disingenuous fraud.

Iraqis have a voice, “but nobody listened.” Will you?

We have committed the invasion.

I have written a book; and if it cannot be refuted, it cannot be condemned. But I do not consider the prosecution as particularly leveled against me, but against the general right, or the right of every man, of investigating systems and principles of government, and showing their several excellencies or defects.” – Thomas Paine

Don’t share this with anyone allergic to truth. I have recently seen testimony that is–shocking is not the right word–horrifying. The official story we have been told about Iraq is a lie so big (though some leader, perhaps modeling for our own, once noted that people are more apt to believe a big lie than a small one), that I fear American heads will roll as a result of its telling, and perhaps justly. The big lie has officially lost legitimacy, and can now only be perpetuated through force. God bless America.

Iraqi leaders have been allowed to talk to members of Congress on CSPAN, and it should well ruin the war propaganda campaign that the Clinton and Bush Administrations, in conjunction with mainstream U.S. media (yes this includes “conservative” talk show hosts), have been orchestrating against the American and Iraqi people for the past decade. What the Iraqis are revealing, to the horror of Americans who have tuned in:

  • “The surge is working” is a lie, and always has been. Anyone who uses this phrase after the revelations of 06.04.08 is either a contemporary or a follower of Goebbels, and should be prosecuted for sedition or libel, before their efforts pave in America, a short road to Nazi Germany. Those who henceforth perpetuate the lie that the surge is working are war criminals, and perpetrate crimes against humanity, by extending an illegal, unjust and murderous war through known falsities.
  • Iraq is undeniably capable of defending itself without U.S. military aid, and has been for some time.
  • The U.S. is not defending Iraq from Iranian invasion.
  • Iraqis would rather have Saddam Hussein than what America has “given” them.
  • Most Iraqis want American forces to withdraw.
  • Continued presence of American troops in Iraq will increase the size and strength of terrorist militias there.

If we believe it too radical to suggest that the people of a nation should govern themselves, if we believe that our distant and uninformed (if not misinformed) opinions will serve the Iraqi people better than their knowledge and experience can serve themselves, if we lack (or unpardonably disregard) the God-given virtues of humility and compassion that the Scripture commands us in all of our affairs to employ, and if we disdain our own blessings so severely that we might arrogantly idolize ourselves as Rulers of the Universe, then we will care very little for what the Iraqi people think of our presence in their country.

As American republicans and good people, what I have described in the preceding stanza is not our condition, but if it were, we could rightly call ourselves evil, and if unrepentant, we would certainly deserve Hell, presuming its existence. If our intentions in Iraq are good, we must seek to remove all ambiguity from our understanding of the conflict, because, as a selfish but quotable man once wrote, “the consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” A selfless and more quotable man expressed as much in fewer words: “mystery is the antagonist of truth.” And I’m told a wise chimpanzee shared a banana. With that in mind, I leave you to the material at hand, with this advice in closing: seek truth, remove ambiguity, remain conscious of good intentions, eliminate mystery, and most importantly, share your bananas.

Why hasn’t the media been telling us that these tan-colored, robed creatures in Iraq are capable of rational thought? I feel misled, for I almost believed Iraqis were little more than cackling orangutans with bombs strapped to their torsos. Apparently this Iraq War thing Americans have been watching almost as attentively as they watched season six of Survivor–Iraqis actually care about it for some reason. You would think the Iraq War actually affected their lives. Go figure. Maybe it does. Who knows? Anyway, I thought it might be interesting to see what these surprisingly rational residents of Mess-o-potamia are saying, and I have compiled some video and quotes from my worldwide web travels.

Some quotes from a prominent Iraqi Shiite leader and a prominent Iraqi Sunni leader, sitting side by side in the Capitol Building in Washington:

“I just would like to assert that Iraq is capable to defend itself.” – Dr. Nadeem Al-Jaberi, Iraqi Parliament

“The majority of the people of Iraq are for the withdrawal, perhaps even about 70 percent.” – Dr. Nadeem Al-Jaberi, Iraqi Parliament

“The [American] Embassy in Iraq has an incredibly large amount of staff. It is certainly larger than the diplomatic mission for which it has arrived. I have information that there may be about three-thousand employees, and there certainly is another view than the one that we see … From the principle of reciprocity, would it be appropriate for the Iraqis to establish a three-thousand employee embassy in Washington?” – Dr. Nadeem Al-Jaberi, Iraqi Parliament

“There definitely is a resentment for the presence of [U.S.] military bases.” – Dr. Nadeem Al-Jaberi, Iraqi Parliament

“I would prefer if it [the invasion of Iraq] didn’t happen, because it led to the destruction of the country. The U.S. got rid of one person. It put in hundreds of persons that are worse than Saddam Hussein. Unfortunately, now Iran is going into Iraq, and this is under the umbrella of the United States.” – Khalaf Al-Ulayyan, Iraqi Parliament

“Increasing the number of forces [a.k.a., the troop surge] didn’t affect the level of violence in Iraq. What led to the reduction of terrorism acts and violence was the forces of … those volunteers from the tribes of the areas where terrorists are more, and those forces managed to eliminate the terrorists, because they know them, and they know their tactics. We suggested that a long time ago for our government and for the American government, but nobody listened. I believe that the reduction of the level of violence is due mainly to the efforts of the volunteers. I believe the thing that will reduce the violence more–not a military force–but having realistic solutions to convince others to join the political process. I believe the best method to achieve that is a real national reconciliation, not only slogans, as is being done now.” – Khalaf Al-Ulayyan, Iraqi Parliament

“Many of the armed militias were established in order to fight the presence of foreign troops on their land, so their justification is to liberate Iraq from the foreign troops, so as soon as the troops have withdrawn, they have no more justification to exist, because it doesn’t make sense for them to start killing their own compatriots. It is my belief that when the troops withdraw, these groups will not bear arms any longer. And for as long as we have foreign troops on our land, these groups will actually increase in number…the presence of foreign troops is actually serving these groups. In the case of a withdrawal, we can rehabilitate them so that they can become civilians, and then include them in the democratic process in Iraq.” – Dr. Nadeem Al-Jaberi, Iraqi Parliament

Video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXelUuw4nWk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3eQVVe-dH0

The skeleton shelf: how the media chooses who loses

Amen.

We the people are under fire from corporate media. Their intent is uncertain, but whether for indiscriminate profit or intentional distraction, media sources are bombarding us with smoke bombs of emotion, which steadily stupefy the American voter.

Take Jeremiah Wright, for example. We are asked to listen to a prominent preacher shout obscenities about our country, and we experience a sense of shock, which naturally turns to curiosity. It is democratic, as well as human, to desire an explantion for any loud display of emotion. The news and pundits, however, never satisfy the public’s curiosity. Network presents clip A to evoke audience emotion B, and network stifles curiosity C by jack-hammering emotion B endlessly into the skulls of audience, until curiosity C disappears, and portions of democratic process and human reason disappear with it. Giving a reasoned explanation of events might diminish dramatic effect and bore the audience, or even cause them to commiserate, where it was intended they should repugn. Whether or not Wright had good reason to shout, his brief exclamations should not have been tossed out nakedly. Corporate news websites provide links to the audio or video of the incendiary bits, but even with their unrestricted format, they rarely (if ever) offer full text of Reverend Wright’s sermons, even though the whole speech is, by definition, a better reflection of character than any one part.

With Wright’s clippings and others like them, corporate media control voters. Wright is just one example of many, in which the media manipulates the voting public using emotional reactions, in this case disenfranchising Barack Obama voters. In truth, every candidate has a pastor Wright–an unseemly, destructive skeleton, of which the media is well aware. There is little doubt that networks could fill entire shelves with “guilt-by-association” files of the remaining three candidates but, thus far, they have chosen to explore only one at any length whatsoever.

We have heard the names “Jeremiah Wright” and “Bill Ayres” over and over again in recent weeks. These two toxic Obama associations are invoked day and evening on network and cable news, and talk radio. Corporate media chooses who will be our president–or rather, who will not be our President–and something about Obama does not sit well with them. It is difficult to identify Obama’s fatal flaw: it could be that he does not properly fear the corporate sponsors; it could be that his thoughts are too independent and unpredictable; it could be that another candidate would bring better profit margins to the right corporations–there is one thing that absolutely is not the reason for Barack Obama’s downfall: his pastor is too outspokenly “anti.”

For those who believe some candidate has no associations like Obama’s, let facts be revealed to a candid world:

Charles H. Keating, Jr. – responsible for fraud and bailouts that cost taxpayers and savers billions in the late 1980s, and John McCain derailed investigation proceedings because Keating had donated a substantial sum to McCain’s campaign. Keating was eventually convicted of fraud, racketeering and conspiracy. The mainstream press has not harped on this story. Why?

Rod Parsley – John McCain calls this man his “spiritual guide,” which sounds familiar to anyone who has heard prevailing Reverend Wright rhetoric. He is a critic of Islam, stating he does “not believe that our country can truly fulfill its divine purpose until we understand America was founded, in part, with the intention of seeing this false religion destroyed.” While Obama’s preacher is held under the fire, McCain’s preacher seems to be getting a pass. Curious, no?

Bill Clinton – Hillary Clinton calls this man “my husband.” How have the darker sides of the Billary saga escaped notice throughout the campaign?

I heard almost two years back that “the fix is in for Hillary,” and I did not believe it at the time, but now I am starting to reconsider.  It is probably true that, had the media spent the last three weeks talking about Bill Clinton’s escapades instead of Barack Obama’s preacher, the Democrat Party’s primary would already be over.  If “the fix is in for Hillary,” then I imagine the Keating Five will become a huge story this autumn–the contrived amnesia of corporate media will suddenly subside, revealing fraudulent bailouts and stalled investigations, and all of McCain’s dirty little secrets.  It will be worn out week after week until you simply can’t consider voting for the man.

If there is a “fix,” who does the fixing?  Who decides what dirt makes the news once, and what dirt is reported over and over and over again?  It’s not the shows’ hosts, or even directors or producers–they’re all worried about making the show seem professional yet unrehearsed–so who?  Here’s a clue: follow the money–follow it all the way back to General Electric, Disney, News Corp., Time Warner, Viacom, etc.  We should all have learned from the false premises of the Iraq War, that profit margins are the root causes of almost every big decision made in the United States today, and that a lie that helps stockholders is easily forgiven.

Regardless of which candidate is on the receiving end of tireless mudslinging, the democratic process is always the real loser, because voters stop basing their votes on policy positions. Of course, this miserable result matches corporate media’s miserable intent. If Americans voted based on policy positions, politicians might stop supporting these corporations’ monopolistic advantages in the U.S. market, which is plainly bad for business.

A democracy’s success depends on the rational and informed voting decisions of its citizens, but our contemporary media’s most notable gifts to society are misinformation and irrationality.  Essentially, our media and our democratic republic are fundamentally at odds with one another, and one of them will have to adapt in order to survive. For the sake of my country I hope–though with limited faith–that the media will do the changing, and the republic will survive.

Letter to the regulatory proponent

More regulation is not helping America

“Despite the long term damage to the economy inflicted by the government’s interference in the housing market, the government’s policies of diverting capital to other uses creates a short-term boom in housing. Like all artificially created bubbles, the boom in housing prices cannot last forever. When housing prices fall, homeowners will experience difficulty as their equity is wiped out. Furthermore, the holders of the mortgage debt will also have a loss. These losses will be greater than they had otherwise been had government policy not actively encouraged over-investment in housing.” – 07/12/2002 (in House, Congressman Ron Paul, R, TX)

The economic problems we are experiencing now are a result of regulation, and we actually wanted them to happen, so that we could have an excuse to propose more regulation. We predicted this recession would happen way back in 2002. We knew it would happen all along, and we were actively warned about it, and we listened, and we decided to let it happen anyway. The Democrats knew it would happen, and so did the Republicans, and they could have stopped it. They didn’t because, quite frankly, they don’t give a sh** about you or me, or anyone else in this country that doesn’t directly help them gain or retain power, or help propagandize people like us. If you think regulation is the answer, read up on Adam Smith and Friedrich Hayek, because you’ve been relying on the “news” for economic information, and they’ve got you painfully brainwashed. Americans now live like feudal serfs, working all of their lives, and never controlling their directions. Socialism is more similar to the tyranny of the past than to the prosperity of the future.

Other things you should know, in your infinite economic wisdom, before you take over the free market and start planning the economy: medical care is only expensive because it is overregulated. any economist will tell you that competition brings down prices, and the government is helping big health/drug companies keep competitors out. the market mechanism actually works pretty well with very little regulation, as long as collusion and monopoly are avoided wherever possible.

And lastly, the reason people work all of their lives at a grueling job for little pay is because the government makes it really hard for them to offer their services at a marketable price, by creating artificial labor surpluses. Workers also give a sizeable percentage of their earnings to government. They also have difficulty using their skills for their own profit because starting a business requires them to fill out long, expensive licensing forms, and they often are discouraged by the added tax burden. Many feel like they can’t go out on their own because they do not know the tax laws well enough, and are afraid they will break the law while trying to help themselves. However, all of these situations help the corporation for which they endlessly slave away, because it keeps the upstarts down. Hooray for taxes.

Stealth bailouts and the Washington Mafia

You’ve been hearing about the Bush/Paulson plan for “streamlining” or “revamping” the “outdated” regulatory system.  Let me take the spin off of this story for you:

 The plan is to allow the Fed to do whatever the hell it wants to, injecting taxpayer money into whatever irresponsible bank needs it for the time being.  After the liquidity pressures in the market subside, the Fed will use its newfound power to stop banks from doing anything stupid again; this is basically a nationalized banking system without a mask.  The unthinkable conclusion of Bush and Paulson is that the only reason we have this recession is because the Fed doesn’t have enough control over our finances, when in fact it is a result of government coercion.  The same federal government that encouraged irresponsible lending is now denouncing it, but offering to pick up the tab.  We should elect people like Ron Paul, or become familiar with the fact that the aristocracy will always win, and the people will always lose.  The people will remain at the mercy of corporation, which hides behind a pretend government.

The more I study this, the more I realize nearly all politicians are scum, and that the federal government is much more similar to a criminal organization than a service organization.  In fact, I can think of no difference between what organized crime does and what the federal government does, except that the federal government has more power, and involves millions of people that only want to do honest business.  To look at what our government does, and want to be a perpetuating force in that process, is a lot like wanting to be made in the Italian mafia.  It’s all about power, prestige, and money, and at its core it is merely a group of thieves who force others to work for them, hiding behind expensive suits, slick haircuts, and a team of grunts with automatic weapons.  I can live with the Sopranos; they don’t steal from me.  I can’t take the Bushes and Clintons anymore.  All the nationalist and/or socialist mobsters can go to hell.  America is for liberty, so get your hands out of our pockets.

Republican Nationalism + Democrat Socialism = U.S. Nazism

National Socialism, better known as Nazism, is Clintobamonomics  combined with Bush-McCain Diplomacy and Secrecy.  When the Democrats and the Republicans do agree to terms, they usually both get what they want.  Democrats get more social planning boards and funds, and Republicans get more spy-on-the-citizens powers and nifty 007 gadgets (which will be sold to overseas dictators as well).  The two parties are hardly distinguishable at this juncture.  American Nazism is nearly upon us.  We are one terrorist attack, or one economic collapse away from martial law.  And we might bomb Iran because they are “proof that evil exists.”  I can’t even intelligently criticize such filth.

Dear Bush,

We have a saying in Tennessee.  It’s “fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me twice, shame on me.”  I think there’s one in Texas too, but it’s said very uncertainly, and doesn’t make as much sense.  Will the American people (or their Congress) be fooled twice?  I am not sure the Americans are that stupid, but clearly you think they are.

Sincerely, me.  P.S.: you can fly.  Jump out the window.  Trust me, it’s true.

Obama inspires people. To do what?

The savior?

Vladimir Lenin inspired people too.  That doesn’t mean his ideas about government were good.  As far as I can tell, Obama only inspires people to encourage the government to take care of all their problems.

DAILY MESSAGE FROM COMRADE OBAMA:

“Good morning, United States Comrade #183790433.  How much free gas, food, and healthcare would you like today?  You feel good about your country.  Go to work if you would like.  Your work helps Obama provide for you.  Just sit around and play Playstation 3 if you prefer.  Either way, Obama will take care of you.  Obama has decided your job is no longer necessary because of its carbon footprint.  You can find a job building wind turbines at the Obama career center, or you can stay home and watch Oprah.  Live comfortably knowing that, if we only hope hard enough, we can meet our great goals as a society.  Enjoy your day of hope and fulfillment.  Yes we can.”