The term “liberal” is misused among Republicans. What they dislike is not true or classical liberalism. Classical liberalism defends individual freedom, and actually advocates a free market. The Democrats the GOP complains about are far from liberal; they are socialists. The “liberal socialist” Democratic party contradicts its own character, because socialism and liberalism cannot naturally coexist. Socialism cannot be implemented without using methods that deny basic liberties.
Americans widely misunderstand their nation’s socioeconomic problems, which have come about because of monopolization and socialization of industry–the steady dismantling of the free market. Democrats have economics all wrong, but so do Republicans. Neither of them actually wants free market capitalism. Both do whatever the corporate lobbyists want them to do. Neither reads the corporate-manufactured, bipartisan legislation–legislation that stifles free market competition, and hurts the individual market participant.
Democrats use a superficial argument that has always appealed to the lowest common denominator: they blame the rich. Those who wield power and have not been elected, according to Democrats, cannot have good intentions. To them, there is nothing noble about employing a hundred people if the employer profits from it. This faulty notion is frighteningly crossing party lines, and socialist sentiment is growing among the leaders of both parties now.
If society rejects profit, private business has no reason to exist, and the state must plan the economy. When profit is stolen by the government, the liberal socialist may momentarily feel triumphant, but this subsides upon the realization that an even larger and more coercive group of elites that were not elected must start forming–this is the group of “experts” that plan the economy private enterprise abandoned. These experts cannot be restricted by the electorate, because the economy is too complex for the people and legislators to agree on its directives. For a socialist nation to be productive, liberty and democracy must necessarily be sidelined–scoring goals in socialism requires totalitarianism.
Democrats should be heard, but cannot be taken seriously on economic policies. Their disdain for corporations is not irrational, but it is partially misplaced, because collective power is naturally corruptive and malevolent, whether it exists in monopoly or in government. Blind faith in government only exists because the faithful are too far removed from democratic government’s historic evils.
Don’t worry, Republicans. I have not forgotten you.
Republican herds argue that corporations naturally become powerful monopolies in free market capitalism, but anyone who has observed the lengths to which corporations go to influence public policy, sees nothing natural about these monopolies. Republicans are but a baby step ahead of socialist Democats; they oppose socialism, but see nothing wrong with corporatism, which may be more productive than socialism, but is perhaps more hostile to individual liberty and almost as destructive to individual prosperity.
Democrat and Republican leaderships should both understand–and we assume they do not, because if they do, we can only conclude that they wish ill upon our nation–that it does not do the nation good to insult the flawed socioeconomic policies of one party, if it is only for the benefit of the flawed socioeconomic policies of another. They should both do what neither is yet willing to do: reject corporatism and maximize competitive forces of the market. In doing so, they will have to sacrifice much power–not an easy thing for a politician to do.
Filed under: economy, Politics | Tagged: corporatism, Corruption, democrats, economics, free markets, freedom, GOP, greed, individualism, liberty, monopoly, Politics, power, republicans, socialism, totalitarianism |