The “Blame-Iraq-First” Crowd


Almost everyone agrees that Al-Qaeda was directly responsible for the attacks on September 11, 2001. However, in the months and years following that day, it became apparent that the situation was not limited to Al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden. A tragedy of such large scale, the people reasoned, had to be the result of something bigger than a simple network of a few hundred Muslims who hated the United States.

A blame game of epic proportion ensued, and two arguments unfolded: one placed the blame on Islamic fundamentalism as the reason the United States was attacked; another placed the blame on political grievances that Middle Eastern people had against the United States. The former evolved into an American argument for war against Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, and probably others yet to come; the latter, a political persuasion to change U.S. foreign policy and demobilize troops around the world.

The talking heads of the former persuasion call the latter the “Blame America First” crowd, and by common logic, would refer to themselves as the “Blame Iraq First” crowd, because both sides actually blamed the Taliban and Al-Qaeda first, and their respective culprits second. Those leaders could correctly replace “First” with “Second” in their titles, but, perhaps for dramatic effect, or to avoid a proper debate, have chosen not to do so.  I will not follow in their path of contrived irrationality.  With respect to the responsibility of 9/11, I am a member of the “Blame-America-Second” coalition, and I strongly disagree with the “Blame Iraq Second” crowd, mainly because only two parties were involved in the incident: Al-Qaeda and America.  The God-given nature of human reason does not allow me to blame a party that was completely remote from the event. 

The “Blame Iraq Second” crowd shares the sentiment of the emotionally irrational, abusive father, who beats his child because of an argument with his colleague; the innocence is irrelevant to the emotional rage.  My intent, as a writer, is to reveal that the “Blame-America-Second” crowd is actually talking sense, and has for its focus, the interest of humankind.  The “Blame-Iraq-Second” argument cannot withstand the test of human reason, so to believe their argument, is to reject that which is in your God-given nature, and seems an abomination to the Almighty.  To favor those who wage war while in an emotional state, without just cause, while living in relative comfort, is opposite of divine, and I need not remind the faithful of what God’s antonym is.


4 Responses

  1. We need to get all of military out of the middle east and stop financing the most hated nation in the world!


  2. This is a very well reasoned piece and should be read by everyone.

  3. Well Reasoned. The neocon and liberal establishments do not even discuss the truth of the matter. I do not blame American. But it is obvious that we have caused many people around the world to hate us because we interfere in their affairs. I don’t know if the radicals in the muslim world hate us because we are not muslim. I do however believe that the vast majority of muslims would prefer peace. They are only supporting the radicals because of our intervention. We are helping recruit people for the radical elements. We have our own radicals here in America. They are called neo-cons and they are lead by Bush. They war monger and fear monger to get our fellow citizens to toe the line and support America against a threat concocted or created by our own leaders. They crush dissent by calling it unpatriotic. Wake up people and see the truth.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: